Former Chairman of Mortgage Lender Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Sentenced to 30 Years in Prison For His Role In Market Crisis Case

On June 30, 2011, Lee Farkas, the former Chairman of Taylor Bean & Whitaker ("TBW"), was sentenced to 30 years in prison for his role the failure of his company and of Colonial Bank. While the sentence fell short of the Government's request for a sentence of 385 years, it is likely that the 58-year old Mr. Farkas will spend the rest of his life in jail. 

Continue Reading...

Supreme Court To Hear Securities Case Regarding Section 16(b) Claims Regarding Short Swing Profits

On Monday, June 27, 2011, the Supreme Court granted Certiorari in Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. Simmonds, Case No. 10-1261. The case involves the right of an issuer (or, in this case, a shareholder bringing a derivative suit) to recover short swing profits obtained by a beneficial owner, director, or officer by reason of his relationship to the issuer under Exchange Act 16(b).

Continue Reading...

Consultant Who Exploited Friendships With Financial Personnel at Public Companies Is Convicted For Insider Trading

On Monday, a federal jury convicted a consultant at an expert networking firm, Winifred Jiau, of one count of conspiracy and one count of securities fraud for selling inside information she obtained through social relationships with sources from the finance departments at publicly traded companies. According to the U.S. Attorney, "Wini Jiau gave new meaning to the concept of social networking. She used and exploited friends at public companies for the purpose of obtaining, and then selling, inside information."

Continue Reading...

Proposed Rule Disqualifies "Bad Boys" from Rule 506 Regulation D Offerings

The SEC has proposed a rule that would disqualify securities offerings involving certain “felons and other ‘bad actors’” from reliance on the safe harbor from Securities Act registration provided by Rule 506 of Regulation D. The rule change is required by Section 926 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

Rule 506 is the most common Regulation D exemption used for private placements. The current version of the rule does not disqualify so-called “bad boys,” and state-level bad actor disqualifications do not apply because securities sold under Rule 506 are “covered securities.”

Under the proposed rule, directors, officers, and significant shareholders, among others, would not be able to participate in securities offerings exempt under Rule 506 if such individuals are subject to convictions, injunctions, and other administrative orders in connection with securities offerings.

Issuers thinking about a 506 offering should consider requiring directors, officers, and promoters to complete a questionnaire designed to elicit information that could trigger a “bad boy” provision. The proposed rule does not require such a questionnaire but does propose a “reasonable care” exception, under which an issuer would not lose the benefit of the Rule 506 safe harbor, despite the existence of a disqualifying event, if it can show that it did not know and, in the exercise of reasonable care, could not have known of the disqualification. The rule release provides that to establish reasonable care, the issuer would be expected to conduct a factual inquiry, the nature and extent of which would depend on the facts and circumstances of the situation.
 

Tags:

SEC Delegates Authority To The Director of the Division of Enforcement To Issue Witness Immunity Orders

On Monday June 13, 2011, the SEC announced that it was amending its rules to delegate authority to the Director of the Division of Enforcement to issue witness immunity orders to compel individuals to give testimony or provide other information. This rule will go into effect for an 18-month period once it is published in the Federal Register.

Continue Reading...

Prosecutors Use Wiretaps To Secure Another Insider Trading Conviction

Less than five weeks after the insider trading conviction of Raj Rajaratnam, prosecutors in New York, again using wiretapped telephone conversations, obtained a second significant conviction for insider trading, this time against Zvi Goffer and two other Wall Street professionals, who were found guilty on Monday of conspiracy and securities fraud charges.

Continue Reading...

Supreme Court Holds That Mutual Fund Investment Adviser Is Not Liable For Statements By the Mutual Fund In The Fund's Prospectus

Today, the Supreme Court ruled that a mutual fund investment adviser cannot be held liable for the statements in a prospectus made by the adviser's client (the mutual fund itself). Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative Traders, No. 09-525, slip op. (Jun. 13, 2011). In doing so, the Court rejected the argument of the Government in an amicus brief that a private plaintiffs should be permitted to sue a person who provides false or misleading information to another person, who then includes that information in a statement. A copy of the opinion is available on the Supreme Court's website.

Continue Reading...

Supreme Court Holds That Securities Fraud Plaintiffs Do Not Need to Prove Loss Causation In Order to Obtain Class Certification

In order to prevail in a private securities fraud action, a plaintiff must demonstrate that defendants' deceptive conduct caused his or her economic loss – a concept known as "loss causation." Today, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that class action plaintiffs do not need to prove loss causation in order to obtain class certification. Erica P. John Fund, Inc. v. Halliburton, Inc., No. 09-1403, slip op. (Jun. 6, 2011).  A copy of the opinion is available on the Supreme Court's website.

Continue Reading...